Strong Leadership and Communication

There have been a number of comments in the news lately about how various public officials have been showing "leadership" by taking definitive stands on various issues. For instance, the governor of Wisconsin has been praised by some for being a leader in his efforts to reduce the ability of union members to participate in collective bargaining. There's no question that Governor Walker has been quite clear as to his position on this matter. He has also made it known that he is unwilling to compromise on it. For some, this represents leadership in the best sense: the Governor has clearly communicated his position along with his intent not to adjust it in any way. His supporters claim he is being strong and providing a clear choice for them to support.

But what if the manner in which Governor Walker is handling this issue is not an example of clean leadership? According to the polls, the great majority of the citizens of Wisconsin do not agree with his position. They do not believe union members should lose their right to collective bargaining. The Governor knows he is going against the will of his constituents. He knows he is attempting to take them in a direction they do not want to go or believe is the best way to go. But Governor Walker is doing it any way. He, of course, is not the first leader to push for actions that are opposed by the majority of those he has been elected to represent. Even his numerous attempts to justify his position have via speeches and interviews have not resulted in any increase in support of his position. What does this suggest about his abilities as a communicator and the specific message he seeks to communicate?

Effective and successful communication is often messy and time consuming. It is far more difficult than standing in front of a podium or a microphone and stating one's position or viewpoints, and ignoring other perspectives. Unfortunately, thus far, this is all that Governor Walker has done. In his various public appearances he has made it clear he has no interest in entering into a meaningful dialog with those who disagree with him and seeking common ground without preconditions. Is this leadership? Perhaps it is technically-speaking. But it is the kind of leadership one equates with bullies. Is he being "strong?" No. Any one with power, such as the governor of a state, can seek to ram through whatever legislation they wish by not trying to be inclusive or build bridges with others. Dialog, compromise and establishing common ground with others is a challenge, but make no mistake it is one that is most worthwhile. Strong leaders and effective communicators understand this. Thus far, Governor Walker and others in positions of leadership who exhibit the same style do not.