The Need for Limits

One thing you can say about a white supremacist is that this is a person with a point of view. Not just any point of view, of course, but one that is locked-in, definite, and not apt to be changed very easily. I mention such a person because they have been in the news lately. Their rallies have showcased a steadfast conviction by this group of people that is disturbing not just because of the specific views they hold, but also they are so damn adamant about it. On the other side, of course, is the greater majority of men and women who view life differently. They, too, carry with them a very firm belief that their view is right and that is all there is to it.

When you put the two people together, particularly when it is these different perceptions that is the reason, then it is no wonder much yelling, anger and even violence is the result. What is to be done? Should the two never be allowed to occupy the same space at the same time? When white supremacists hold a rally - as is their right - should those wishing to take issue with them not be allowed to attend? After all, would not keeping these people apart ensure that no violence erupts or that no one is harmed?

Is their a communication solution to the dilemma of how best folks with their particular diametrically-opposed views can co-exist and even vocalize their opposing perceptions without worry of violence? Ideally, of course, the answer is "yes." But reality suggests the opposite answer. Emotions run high during such interaction and can and do lead some to act-out their attitude in ways that result in the physical harm of some. This points to the notion that communication, at times, must be practiced with set boundaries or rules. People cannot always be trusted to communicate respectfully and with a sense of openness.